did bees exist on earth as early as 200 million years ago
Many skeptics doubt that the discovered fossil structures which are proven to be formed 200 million years ago were not created by bees. Their position is based on three points: lack of fossils of real bees, absence of flowering plants, and structures without certain patterns. However, the professor disputes their argument by giving respective explanations.
First of all, The reason why there are no fossils of actual bees discovered can be explained by the absence of trees with special characteristics. For example, the ancient bees' remains can only be preserved in a liquid produced by some kind of trees. But the trees 200 millions years ago did not exist or were very rare at that time. So the existence of the bees can be possible.
In addition, although no evidence shows to support the exists of flowering plants as early as 200 millions years ago, bees at that time might survive on non-flowering plants such as pine trees. This can also explain the existence of ancient bees.
Last but not the least, modern chemical evidence discovered some water-proving materials in these structures. We can draw some speculations that ancient bees create these materials instead of producing modern spiral patterns.
To sum up, according to the professor, all these three arguments can be explained to conclude that it is fairly possible for ancient bees to exist as early as 200 millions years ago.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, so, for example, in addition, kind of, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1175.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 232.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06465517241 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71248804772 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573275862069 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5834890963 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9166666667 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359295185901 0.272083759551 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134157917333 0.0996497079465 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139294776917 0.0662205650399 210% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210674754715 0.162205337803 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119323113854 0.0443174109184 269% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.