The lecturer disputes the author's suggested claims that bees nest existed 200 million years ago. He provides three concrete reasons to cast doubt about the author's claims.
First, according to the author fossils of bees did not exist 200 millions years ago because the earliest bees fossils are dated only 120 years ago. However, the lecturer finds this idea debatable. He contends that indeed fossils may have existed, but because of the absence of trees raisins which act as a preservative to protect the nest structure, it might have been destroyed over time.
Second, the lecturer contradict the fallacy of the passage that since flowering plants did not exist in that period of time, it is unlikely the nests fossils did exist either because bees feed on flowering plants. However, The lecturer argues that theoretically speaking, they may have existed because fossil of pine and fern trees were discovered, it is possible that these plant have evolved later in time to flowering trees. Thus, food may have been available.
Finally, the author claims that bees nests lack some important details in their structure like the caps. Again, the lecturer refutes these claims by stating that it is possible that the material which protects the nests from the damaging water effect may have been missing. He states this may alter the nest structure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... flowering plants did not exist in that period of time, it is unlikely the nests fossils did e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, may, second, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 222.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11261261261 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3076827607 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572072072072 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.1084283178 49.2860985944 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.181818182 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 7.06452816374 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280265008584 0.272083759551 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107576868841 0.0996497079465 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118489228248 0.0662205650399 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17882737316 0.162205337803 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0910039082642 0.0443174109184 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.