There are different ways for students to learn. Some teachers prefer their students to work individually claiming that they are able to finish work earlier. Other teachers prefer their students to work in groups. In my vantage point, I am more inclined with the latter group because of several reasons.
First, students working in groups develop their communication skills. Many students lack the ability to communicate clearly with their colleagues because of being shy. Clearly, enrolling these students in individual work project will not help them to overcome this weakness. On the contrary, If those students were given the chance to work in groups, they are going to become more confident, better talkative, and skillful speakers.My experience is a compelling example. During my education at the university, I had a case presentation course where I had to discuss a disease with other students and present a twenty minutes presentation afterwards. The objective of this course was to make students exposed to different ideas through communication with other colleagues in class.. excitedly, I participated in the course. and After completing it, I was able to express my thoughts clearly. It was a great experience that I must admit helped to get my first job in the field. Therefore, undoubtedly, a group project task may help students in their future career
Secondly, students who work in groups are able think creatively. One of the drawbacks of working individually is the limited exposure to others ideas. If we work in groups, then we are able to hear different view about the same topic, which encourages us to think out of the box. For instance, if we are discussing ways to solve the environment pollution, we can come out with couple of ideas. However, once we hear other's thoughts , we find that there are others way available to help create a cleaner environment.
Although the aforementioned reasons are the first to come to my mind, they are by no means the only reasons available. In fact, there is another subtle reason that is worth to be mentioned, which is the noteworthy, refreshingly, intelligibly study published in the school academy journal last year, which showed that students learning in groups are more productive and are able to learn faster than their peers who study individually. The study was conducted on 120 student from different schools to prevent bias.
To sum up, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons one soon realizes that working in groups does not only help students to be more confident, but also to be more courageous. By giving the students the opportunity to work in groups, we provide them with the foundation to excel in their future.
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged animal..... 54
- Some people believe that a college or university education should be available to all students. Others believe that higher education should be available only to good students. Discuss these views. Which view do you agree with? 76
- It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: A university education should be provided for free of charge to all interested scholars.Use examples and reasons to support your position. 80
- People learn in different ways. Some people learn by doing things, other people learn by reading about things, others learn by listening to people talk about things.Which of these methods of learning is best for you? Use specific examples to support your 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: My
...better talkative, and skillful speakers.My experience is a compelling example. Du...
^^
Line 3, column 781, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...unication with other colleagues in class.. excitedly, I participated in the course...
^^
Line 3, column 784, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Excitedly
...cation with other colleagues in class.. excitedly, I participated in the course. and Afte...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 825, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...xcitedly, I participated in the course. and After completing it, I was able to expr...
^^^
Line 3, column 1063, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...may help students in their future career Secondly, students who work in groups ar...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 432, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s. However, once we hear others thoughts , we find that there are others way avail...
^^
Line 7, column 467, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'student' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'students'.
Suggestion: students
...idually. The study was conducted on 120 student from different schools to prevent bias....
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 300, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he foundation to excel in their future.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, as to, for instance, in fact, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 10.4613686534 239% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 22.412803532 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 30.3222958057 231% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2267.0 1373.03311258 165% => OK
No of words: 444.0 270.72406181 164% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10585585586 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.04702891845 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88456006732 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 145.348785872 156% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511261261261 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 694.8 419.366225166 166% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 3.25607064018 338% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 13.0662251656 176% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5843388945 49.2860985944 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5652173913 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3043478261 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69565217391 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 4.33554083885 277% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0651818089912 0.272083759551 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0226495395311 0.0996497079465 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.014102345144 0.0662205650399 21% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.040220776327 0.162205337803 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0142795823234 0.0443174109184 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 63.6247240618 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.