Regarding to the lecture, skeptics believes that the discovered chamber, which belonged to 200 million years ago could not have been related to the Bees. Conversely, the professor thinks that it was possible that the found fossil were remnants of bee's chamber. She argues three reason to call the author's notion into question.
The first theory says that, no fossils of actuall bees was found from that time, and the latest fossil found belonged to 100 million years ago. The professor mentions no insect could have been preserved since that long time. The found bees were trapped in the a resin of a special plant and were found as an Amber. It is possible that 200 million years ago the plants that were able to make the resin were absent, therefore not bees were preserved.
Second paragraph talks about lack of flowering plants, it postulates that if modern bees have a coexistence with flowering plants, the traditional species of bees also should have a corelation with it. Again the professor rebuts this theory by saying that, it was possible that bees have lived before emerge of flowering plants. She explains that early bees could have consumed ferns or other trees and gain its foods.
Finally, based on text, structures of the chamber lacks details of modern bee's chamber and does not have the same cap which modern chambers has. The professor claims that lack of such evidennce does not necessarily means that they were not made by bees. In fact, chemical evidences support the similarty of the ancient chambers with modern ones. The lecturer clarifies that modern bees use a kind of water proof substance to make their nest, and it was observed in the found fossil.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...er. She argues three reason to call the authors notion into question. The first theory...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 225, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ve been preserved since that long time. The found bees were trapped in the a resin ...
^^^
Line 2, column 256, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...ng time. The found bees were trapped in the a resin of a special plant and were found...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 215, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'mean'
Suggestion: mean
... of such evidennce does not necessarily means that they were not made by bees. In fac...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 400, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: waterproof
...larifies that modern bees use a kind of water proof substance to make their nest, and it wa...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, in fact, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1399.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87456445993 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26721394625 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533101045296 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7703838322 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9285714286 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305379322266 0.272083759551 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101715798087 0.0996497079465 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700491363913 0.0662205650399 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179813834632 0.162205337803 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651428469537 0.0443174109184 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.