did Sinasauropteryx have feather or not. Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made reading passage.
The reading and the lecture are both about the credence of the of the hypothesis regarding Sinasauropteryx. In the passage the author provides three theories in order to refute the interpretations of the evidence acquired through fossils which argue that this type of dinosaur had feather. On the other hand, the professor is not convinced of this and casts doubt on each of the theories presented in the passage. The lecturer is of the opinion that these dinosaurs, definitely, had feather based on the following debated.
First of all, the author argues that the lines which are defined as remains of the feather can be created after the animals were dismissed. Accordingly, the passage mentions that the skin has decomposed into fibers, and the fibers have been preserved in the volcano ash, where the bodies has been buried. This specific argument has been challenged by the lecturer. According to the professor, since other bodies corps’ skins in the same site were totally preserved, these lines are not formed from fibers created by skin decomposition. Therefore, the lecturer firmly clings to this claim that the lines are caused by feather.
Secondly, the writer disputes that these lines can give rise to the hypothesis that they are shaped from frills’ remains which is fan-shape structure out of the animals’ body. The lecturer, on the contrary, opposed this notion by providing the chemical analysis evidences. furthermore, he elaborates on this by bringing the point that feather has a chemical substance thoroughly distinct from frills, which gives credence to the note that they cannot be mistaken.
Finally, the writer points to the ordinary function of the feather to averts that the remains are not from feather. To elucidate, it is mentioned in the passage that animals apply their feather for thermoregulation or flying purposes; however, they have been assumed needless of both these objections. In contrast, the professor put forward to the point that beside these purposes, animals utilize feather to attract their mate which is known as display function. Hence, since these animals structure indicates colorfulness, it can be implied that they apply display function, and hardly we can assert that the remains were not feather.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'of the'.
Suggestion: of the
...the lecture are both about the credence of the of the hypothesis regarding Sinasauropteryx. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'feathered'.
Suggestion: feathered
...ch argue that this type of dinosaur had feather. On the other hand, the professor is no...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'feathered'.
Suggestion: feathered
...ch argue that this type of dinosaur had feather. On the other hand, the professor is no...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 626, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m that the lines are caused by feather. Secondly, the writer disputes that these...
^^^
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...viding the chemical analysis evidences. furthermore, he elaborates on this by bringing the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 629, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'feathered'.
Suggestion: feathered
...we can assert that the remains were not feather.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, in contrast, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 30.3222958057 168% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1903.0 1373.03311258 139% => OK
No of words: 363.0 270.72406181 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24242424242 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73092667822 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495867768595 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.9 419.366225166 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4635908148 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.9375 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6875 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4375 7.06452816374 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185814251855 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645999139452 0.0996497079465 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447843624787 0.0662205650399 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109421985713 0.162205337803 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309750237246 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 63.6247240618 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'of the'.
Suggestion: of the
...the lecture are both about the credence of the of the hypothesis regarding Sinasauropteryx. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'feathered'.
Suggestion: feathered
...ch argue that this type of dinosaur had feather. On the other hand, the professor is no...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'feathered'.
Suggestion: feathered
...ch argue that this type of dinosaur had feather. On the other hand, the professor is no...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 626, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m that the lines are caused by feather. Secondly, the writer disputes that these...
^^^
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...viding the chemical analysis evidences. furthermore, he elaborates on this by bringing the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 629, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'feathered'.
Suggestion: feathered
...we can assert that the remains were not feather.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, in contrast, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.4613686534 201% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 30.3222958057 168% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1903.0 1373.03311258 139% => OK
No of words: 363.0 270.72406181 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24242424242 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73092667822 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495867768595 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 585.9 419.366225166 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4635908148 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.9375 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6875 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4375 7.06452816374 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185814251855 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645999139452 0.0996497079465 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447843624787 0.0662205650399 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109421985713 0.162205337803 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309750237246 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 63.6247240618 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.