Dinosaurs endothermic
Both reading and lecture talk about dinosaurs. Whereas, the author mentions that dinosaurs are endothermic. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes this claim and says that dinosaurs are not endothermic. He points out the claims of the author by citing three reasons below.
First, according to the passage, it is stated that dinosaur’s fossils were found in polar regions. this claim proves that dinosaurs are endothermic based on the author thoughts; therefore, the lecturer refuses this line of thought and attests that finding of fossils does not prove the claim that dinosaurs are endotherm. He adds that according to the cold weather, dinosaurs might have moved from other places to polar regions.
Secondly, the author believes that having underneath legs shows that dinosaurs are endothermic; however, the professor rebuts this opinion and alleges that having underneath legs does not prove the idea that says dinosaurs are endothermic. He expresses that being underneath legs have other explanation such as growing the size of dinosaurs. He states that because dinosaurs have great weight; thus, underneath legs help them to grow in size.
Finally, it is mentioned in the passage that a connection between endotherm and bone structure shows that dinosaurs are endothermic. the author says that endothermic animals have Haversian canals that trigger dinosaurs grow quickly; nevertheless, the professors denies this point of assertion and says that the pattern growth of dinosaurs during warm and cols period evident enough to held the claim that the dinosaurs are not endothermic.
To sum up, it is claimed in the passage that dinosaurs are endotherm that warm or cold weather do not influence on their growth; furthermore, the lecturer rejects this line of explanation and says that research show that dinosaurs are not endothermic. He brings three compelling reasons which refute the words of the author.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Both reading and lecture talk about dino...
^^^^
Line 3, column 48, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ading and lecture talk about dinosaurs. Whereas, the author mentions that dinosaurs are...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...author by citing three reasons below. First, according to the passage, it is s...
^^^^
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...;s fossils were found in polar regions. this claim proves that dinosaurs are endothe...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d from other places to polar regions. Secondly, the author believes that havin...
^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...neath legs help them to grow in size. Finally, it is mentioned in the passage ...
^^^^
Line 15, column 134, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...e shows that dinosaurs are endothermic. the author says that endothermic animals ha...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, whereas, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 12.0772626932 199% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 22.412803532 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43377483444 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72600029059 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480132450331 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 475.2 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.6410313692 49.2860985944 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.214285714 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 7.06452816374 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406888149265 0.272083759551 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156228569808 0.0996497079465 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130907592297 0.0662205650399 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265446659311 0.162205337803 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121524681823 0.0443174109184 274% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.