The dinosaurs known as sauropods were the largest animals ever to walk the Earth.
In the lecture, the professor cast doubt on the claim that sauropods were terrestrial animals, citing evidence that the ancient species may live near water.
First, while the short legs of Brachiosaurus might leave them unable to walk on land, there is fossil evidence showing footprints of Brachiosaurus on land. Moreover, some fossil tracks even indicate that this colossal animal can lift their two front legs, which is a feature of land-dwelling creatures.
Second, the long neck of Brachiosaurus may serve as a good tool for it to reach the leaves of tall trees, similar to a giraffe. Even if the weight of the neck hinders it from reaching high, simply consuming the plants the height of the dinosaur is enough due to the tall figure of it. Furthermore, since its neck is quite long, it can span a considerable range, meaning that it can take up much food with ease.
Third, Brachiosaurus does not have the suitable feet to wade in the muddy swamp. For an animal to survive in water, it needs to have short and wide legs like those of a hippo. Nonetheless, the legs of Brachiosaurus is so thin that may render it difficult walk in water.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the lecture, the professor cast doubt...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ancient species may live near water. First, while the short legs of Brachiosa...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it can take up much food with ease. Third, Brachiosaurus does not have the s...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... may render it difficult walk in water.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, second, so, third, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 1373.03311258 70% => OK
No of words: 201.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75124378109 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66540402275 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.63184079602 0.540411800872 117% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 419.366225166 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.4244721549 49.2860985944 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.111111111 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11111111111 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0951066994319 0.272083759551 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0350136210989 0.0996497079465 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0286242549414 0.0662205650399 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0552079806653 0.162205337803 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240752620514 0.0443174109184 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 63.6247240618 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.