During the eighteenth century the Rococo style became predominant in European art and architecture The style emphasized bright colors elaborate ornamentation and the use of playful designs and subject matter While Rococo artists dominated Europe for decad

Essay topics:

During the eighteenth century, the Rococo style became predominant in European art and architecture. The style emphasized bright colors, elaborate ornamentation, and the use of playful designs and subject matter. While Rococo artists dominated Europe for decades, since the nineteenth century the style has been widely ridiculed.
Perhaps the most historically interesting reason that Rococo art lost popularity is that Rococo artists often worked for aristocratic patrons, decorating mansions and palaces. However, the late eighteenth century saw major political revolutions in Europe emphasizing social equality. Rococo artists, meanwhile, created overly elaborate, expensive art for wealthy audiences who exploited or ignored the working class. Rococo art came to symbolize the arrogance and vanity of the old ruling classes.
Rococo was also condemned for its frivolous subject matter. Later artistic movements often put great emphasis on creating art with positive social messages. Rococo artists, in contrast, tended to focus on non-serious subject matter, such as aristocrats playing games in the countryside or lovers on picnics. The artists’ lack of engagement with serious philosophical ideas meant their work had little depth or sophistication.
Finally, the Rococo’s emphasis on the use of expensive materials to create an illusion of opulence has also fallen into disfavor. Today, elements such as gilded surfaces and beaming cherubs, hallmarks of Rococo art, seem more gaudy than inspired. For generations of viewers, the style has come to epitomize the idea of “style over substance.” Its use of asymmetrical designs and emphasis on melodramatic uses of light and color often create an over-the-top rather than impressive effect

The read and the lecture are both about Rocco's artistic style. The article's author feels that artists lost interest in Rocco's style. The lecturer disputes the claims made in the article. His position is that the article shows only one side of Rocco's style.

According to the reading, Rocco's style was for Aristocratic partons. Meanwhile, Europe at that time was looking for equality between social classes. The lecturer challenges this argument. She claims that the article looks down on Rocco's style. Additionally, she points out that Rocco's art was not exclusive to wealthy audiences. Churches in Europe used this style to decorate their buildings.

Secondly, the author suggests that Rocco's style was not serious art and had no meaning nor deliver any messages. In the article, it is said that contemporary artists tried to deliver messages through their works. The lecturer, however, asserts that Rocco's art was not superficial. She says that many paints used Rocco's style focused on tiny details and expressed faces' impressions. Moreover, she claims that Rocco's style explores the subject with sensitivity.

Finally, the author posits that Rocco's style used expensive materials. The author contended that nowadays, art focuses more on the style over the substance. In contrast, the lecturer's stance is that Rocco's style might concentrate on the substance, but it does not mean ignoring the style. She notes that Rocco's style depended on mixing colors and multimedia to express the artistic style.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... artists lost interest in Roccos style. The lecturer disputes the claims made in th...
^^^
Line 3, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cos style. According to the reading, Roccos style was for Aristocratic parton...
^^
Line 7, column 175, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...le over the substance. In contrast, the lecturers stance is that Roccos style might conce...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, as for, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1273.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 238.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3487394958 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51868590498 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550420168067 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 21.2450331126 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.8619440658 49.2860985944 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 67.0 110.228320801 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.5263157895 21.698381199 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.57894736842 7.06452816374 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.27373068433 281% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200372727682 0.272083759551 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790596115646 0.0996497079465 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455481594701 0.0662205650399 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144595480553 0.162205337803 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314620419495 0.0443174109184 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 53.8541721854 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.86 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.0 10.7273730684 37% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.498013245 65% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.