The professor said that the points made in the reading passage is over stated. According to the author, Rococo style was uninspired because of the shallow subject matters so Rococo style pictures are criticised since the nineteenth century. The following reasons made by the speaker would support his opinion.
First, Rococo artists worked with aristcrats so the paintings expressed their arrogance and symbol of their classes. However, the lecturer shows that the painter draw pictures for well off so many paintings are stored in church today. The church is the meeting place for people at lower classes too because of the religious thus it is not only for people own great money.
Second, Rococo style focused on express normal life style so they often paint non-serious object or events such as a couple enjoying a swing together. These unspecial subject is scorned sometime however the professor points that even they enjoy normal lifestyle issue in the picture, the painter putted an effort into details such as facial expression. Therefore, it is hardly to say that Rococo style artists are superficial.
Finally, using of expensive equipments gave a bad impression. In contrast, the professor thinks that the Rococo style was a forerunner to us today. The materials and effection they have used are totally new at that time. For example, the asymmetrical designes and the light usage as a melodramatic are needed to express their ideas. Therefore, the Rococo style should be reputed as good as other methods of painting style.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 250.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.176 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54550898643 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8904111029 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4285714286 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25835697889 0.272083759551 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863663959463 0.0996497079465 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819835985141 0.0662205650399 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154724661464 0.162205337803 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049160144723 0.0443174109184 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.