effect of commercial fossil collectors
The reading passage state that commercial fossil collectors have a bad influence on the fossils and scientific research however, the professor on the lecture casts doubt on the points expressed in the passage.
First, the article considers that the collectors excavate the fossils and to purchase them far from the general public, on the contrary, the professor contradicts the idea and further explains that in most situations collectors sell fossils to the libraries or schools for general exhibition and research.
Second, the reading claims that the scientists lose access to the most important fossils admittedly, the speaker in the article justified the information presented in the passage and makes the point that it's not true and in every excavation for fossils, the first one who see and research on the validity of them is a scientist.
Third, the author in the passage puts forward the idea that the fossils collectors pay no attention to how fossils lie and maybe make the damage on them on the other hand, the professor validates the point and adds that it didn't have negative points in compare with the advantage of excavation more fossils for research and exhibition.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 105, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ssils and to purchase them far from the general public, on the contrary, the professor contrad...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 224, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...or validates the point and adds that it didnt have negative points in compare with th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, third, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 10.4613686534 10% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 1373.03311258 72% => OK
No of words: 194.0 270.72406181 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11855670103 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67048618038 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 145.348785872 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525773195876 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 419.366225166 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 13.0662251656 31% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 48.0 21.2450331126 226% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.4548065104 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 248.25 110.228320801 225% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 48.5 21.698381199 224% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 19.5 7.06452816374 276% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279572993248 0.272083759551 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183210175034 0.0996497079465 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883862439612 0.0662205650399 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183210175034 0.162205337803 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0883862439612 0.0443174109184 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 26.9 13.3589403974 201% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 31.22 53.8541721854 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.8 11.0289183223 189% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.3 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 63.6247240618 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.7273730684 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 21.2 10.498013245 202% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 21.0 11.2008830022 187% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.