fossils collection
The reading passage states that negative points of private collector business however, the professor in the lecture casts doubt on the points made in the reading.
First, considering the article collectors will keep their fossils collection away from the public contrast, the professor in the lecture substantiates the idea and further explains that the fossils representation in the public is critical for collectors because they will be able to purchase them to schools or research institutes for study or exhibition.
Second, the reading claims that the scientists lose their access to the wealthy fossils for their details study, on the contrary, the professor in the lecture justifies the information presented in the reading and makes the point that scientists evaluating any fossils that find during excavation and she thinks about the beginning fossils pass scientist’s hands for a test.
Third, the author in the reading passage puts forward the idea that the probability of destroying valuable evidence during the cell of fossils. On the other hand, the speaker validates the idea and adds that there is a positive aspect that effort in excavation raising up and the number of fossils available in public increase.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, third, in contrast, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 10.4613686534 10% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1045.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 193.0 270.72406181 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41450777202 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60987701352 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 145.348785872 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528497409326 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 419.366225166 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 13.0662251656 38% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 21.2450331126 179% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 105.005904596 49.2860985944 213% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 209.0 110.228320801 190% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.6 21.698381199 178% => OK
Discourse Markers: 17.2 7.06452816374 243% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293611644725 0.272083759551 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119624167987 0.0996497079465 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121740783544 0.0662205650399 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142235173824 0.162205337803 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122123572499 0.0443174109184 276% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.4 13.3589403974 175% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.91 53.8541721854 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.0289183223 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.69 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.498013245 164% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.2008830022 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.