the disadvantage and advantage of online encyclopedias.
The reading passage state the disadvantage of online encyclopedias. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubt on the points made in the reading.
First, considering the article contributes to an online encyclopedia lack of academic credentials and informed downright inaccurate in many cases. In contrast, the professor in the lecture contradicts the idea and further explains that online encyclopedias have a great way for recorrect and edit the errors and misunderstanding of some facts and it is so useful for users that they can participate, edit and improve writing the articles in variety of aspects any time.
Second, the reading claims that in the online encyclopedias hackers have opportunity for corrupt information and data in the encyclopedia. Admittedly, the professor in the lecture justifies the information presented in the reading and makes the point that we can install protector on the articles and keep them in a safe environment on the internet.
Third, the author in the reading passage puts forward the idea that it maybe creates a false impression about what is important and what is not in the articles. In the same way, the speakers validate the idea and add that there is no worry about this issue and there is virtually unlimited space and moreover clever people can find essential facts for themeselves.
To sum up, both the writer and speaker had conflicting views about online encyclopedias. It's clear that they will have trouble finding common ground on this issue.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, third, in contrast, in many cases, to sum up, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1280.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24590163934 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97122950707 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55737704918 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.5722171171 49.2860985944 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3 7.06452816374 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197347015323 0.272083759551 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842872062739 0.0996497079465 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0991879431949 0.0662205650399 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10481071347 0.162205337803 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646510762626 0.0443174109184 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.7273730684 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.