reject the advantage of storing information about patients in electronic databases by speaker.
Recently, there has been a ton of debates as to records and storing information about patients in electronic databases. Most specifically, with regard to the passage, the writer puts forth the idea that medical's records in electronic databases have several advantages over traditional way. In the listening, the lecturer is quick to point out there are serious flaws in the writer's idea. In fact, the professor believes the benefits about this new approach are very uncertain.
First and foremost, the author in the article states that electronic records can help reduce costs by saving money for necessary tasks not for faxing, copying and some staff like these. Some professionals, in the same field, however, stand in firm opposition to this claim. In the listening, the speaker states doctors only keep information for the emergency. He goes on to say that they don't need them always and most doctors don't pay any money for storage costs.
One group of scholars presented by the writer think that electronic medical records can reduce medical errors due to improper transcription of data. Of course, though, not all the experts in the same field, believe this claim is accurate. In the listening, for example, the lecturer states most doctors still use paper for their notes by hand and they don't willing to enter their notes on the computer.
Finally, the writer wraps his argument by positing that in this way aiding for research in the medical era be more easy and accessible. In the listening, the professor takes issue by contending that research access in this era needs allow and have privacy laws.
To sum up, both the writer and speaker hold conflicting views about keeping medical records in databases. It is clear that they have no common ground on this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 375, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...oint out there are serious flaws in the writers idea. In fact, the professor believes t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 390, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... emergency. He goes on to say that they dont need them always and most doctors dont ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... dont need them always and most doctors dont pay any money for storage costs. One...
^^^^
Line 5, column 353, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... paper for their notes by hand and they dont willing to enter their notes on the com...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, so, still, as to, for example, in fact, of course, to sum up, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 297.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0202020202 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54101924171 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565656565657 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 2.5761589404 349% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.156538826 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163008087474 0.272083759551 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055513647317 0.0996497079465 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890387631115 0.0662205650399 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0864457843052 0.162205337803 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0944932197075 0.0443174109184 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.