huge houses of Chaco's people
The reading passage states that the settlements of Chaco were notable for there huge houses with contains hundred of rooms that were for several mysteries used. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubts on the points made in the article.
First, considering the reading that those kinds of buildings were for hundreds of residents to have been living in there. In contrast, the professor contradicts the idea and further explains this reason and talks about the inside of houses that not so suitable for living and do not have enough fireplaces for hundreds of residents.
Second, the reading claims that maybe Chaco structures were used to store food supplies like grain maize. Admittedly, the professor in the lecture justifies the information presented in the article and makes the points that there is no evidence during an excavation in the houses and scientists not find any big counter for food storing.
Third, the author in the reading passage puts forward the idea that maybe the houses were used as ceremonial centers. In the same way, the speaker validates the idea and adds that there are not many facilities for such these ceremonies and there are just few staffs in some rooms.
To sum up, both the writer and the professor hold conflicting views about huge houses of Chaco's people. It is clear that they will have trouble finding ground on this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...ble for there huge houses with contains hundred of rooms that were for several mysterie...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 37, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'those kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; those kinds
... First, considering the reading that those kind of buildings were for hundreds of resid...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... there are not many facilities for such this ceremonies and there are just a few sta...
^^^^
Line 7, column 257, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun staff seems to be countable; consider using: 'few staffs', 'few staves'.
Suggestion: few staffs; few staves
...ch this ceremonies and there are just a few staff in some rooms. To sum up, both the w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 261, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'staffs', 'staves'?
Suggestion: staffs; staves
...his ceremonies and there are just a few staff in some rooms. To sum up, both the w...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, third, in contrast, kind of, to sum up, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1150.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97835497835 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39325432688 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558441558442 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3664866078 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.06452816374 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18691554217 0.272083759551 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751178528899 0.0996497079465 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912516381283 0.0662205650399 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113760510743 0.162205337803 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690338236409 0.0443174109184 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.