The reading passage claims that there are many skeptics doubt on the structure have been found inside fossilized trees that were created by bees. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubt on the points made in the reading.
The reading passage claims that there are many skeptics doubt on the structure have been found inside fossilized trees that were created by bees. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubt on the points made in the reading.
First, considering the article no fossil remains of actual bees have ever been found that date to 200 million years ago. In contrast, the professor in the lecture contradicts the idea and made the points that some insects fossilized by trees' resin, and this kind of tree fossilize are very rare.
Second, the reading passage claims that bees existed 200 million years ago is the absence of flowering plants in that period. Admittedly, the professor validates the idea and adds that maybe bees in 200 million years ago feed non-flowering plants, and after first appeared flower plants they feed blossom plants.
Third, the writer in the reading puts forward the idea that while the fossilized structures found in Arizona, they lack some of the finer details of bees' nests. In the same way, the speaker justified the information presented in the article and make the points that during different analyzes scientists find that there is some chemical evidence that materials in the structure are similar to the material in modern bees nests.
To sum up, both the writer and speaker hold conflicting views about structures made by bees in 200 million years ago.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es have ever been found that date to 200 million years ago. In contrast, the prof...
^^
Line 7, column 121, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... structures found in Arizona, they lack some of the finer details of bees nests. In the sam...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, third, while, in contrast, kind of, to sum up, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1171.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 232.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0474137931 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37514862793 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504310344828 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 343.8 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4997194156 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.111111111 110.228320801 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7777777778 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06452816374 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.449225714119 0.272083759551 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.203932713665 0.0996497079465 205% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.193114963183 0.0662205650399 292% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273501398282 0.162205337803 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.276704676927 0.0443174109184 624% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.