The lecture and the reading passage offer three opposing views on a method of reducing hail, called "cloud seeding" in order to produce harmless rain or snow instead of hail. While, some reasons are stated in passage supporting "cloud seeding", the lecturer casts some doubts on this reasons.
First, the lecturer claims that doing experiments under lab situation and under real situation may lead to different results and it is not logical to rely only on experiments under lab circumstances. While light snow forming is observed in lab, the lecturer states that utilizing this method, may causes the lack of rain in some clouds in real situation.
Next, the lecturer mentions that, evidences from Asia are related to using this method just in urban areas. Although it is said in the reading passage that "cloud seeding" in some Asian Countries has been successfully used, the lecturer states that these positive results may not also be effective in the USA because she believes that Asian urban areas have a large amount of air pollution and this air pollution can chemically interact with silver iodide. So, using this method in unpolluted area like America may not work properly.
Finally, according to passage, however, observations from a study found that in area which this method was used there was reduced hail damage, the lecturer asserts that hail damage reduction was not specifically occurred in that special area and this reduction occurred in many areas around the tested area. Thus, hail damage decrease can be due to some natural variations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 300, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...pos;, the lecturer casts some doubts on this reasons. First, the lecturer claims...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 256.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67382741166 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578125 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.7743258457 49.2860985944 192% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.333333333 110.228320801 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4444444444 21.698381199 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0576174290104 0.272083759551 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0246577279238 0.0996497079465 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0207628403412 0.0662205650399 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0354985600507 0.162205337803 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0128868784557 0.0443174109184 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.3589403974 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.8541721854 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.