The lecturer and the reading passage offer three opposing views on the possibility of sending humans to Mars. Although there are some reasons stated in the reading passage which cast some doubts on the probability of this travel, the lecturer states some reasons which support the idea of sending humans to Mars.
First, the lecturer says that there are some plants called Hydroponics which can be cultivated in water instead of soil. While it is mentioned in the reading passage that the trip to the Mars would last about two years and the capacity of space vehicles is not enough to bring large amounts of food, water and oxygen, the lecturer states that the Hydroponics recycle water and produce a large amount of drinking water and also these plants release oxygen which helps astronauts survive. So, by cultivating these plants in water this problem will be solved.
Next, the lecturer asserts that there are several astronauts which have lived in zero gravity situations for a long time owing to exerting some techniques. Although it is stated in the reading passage that zero gravity circumstances adversely effect on human body and make the trip difficult, the lecturer says that there are some exercises which help the astronauts manage this severe situation by adapting their muscles and bone to tolerate negative effects of zero gravity.
Finally, the lecturer claims that some space radiation are not dangerous all the time and they can harm astronauts just when they are active. Hence, she says that astronauts should utilize an instrument to monitor the space radiation and determine the time they are active. While it is mentioned in the reading passage that constructing shield would add surplus weight to the ship, the lecturer asserts that astronauts should install a small shield on their ship and just use it when the monitoring system indicates the dangerous situations.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, hence, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 311.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11897106109 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44640232957 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479099678457 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.9 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 21.2450331126 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 93.1466048764 49.2860985944 189% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.2 110.228320801 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1 21.698381199 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 7.06452816374 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0576982725734 0.272083759551 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0276488128254 0.0996497079465 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.025661758836 0.0662205650399 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0383862263105 0.162205337803 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233886357072 0.0443174109184 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.3589403974 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 53.8541721854 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.0289183223 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.498013245 137% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.