Since the dawn of civilization and industrialization, all around the world, people are confronting with various kinds of problems in their professional careers during their life. While there are some problems which people can easily overcome them, a plenty of complex projects and problems which require people and students to think more deeply on them. There is a drastic contrast between different people on whether they prefer to do these overwhelming projects alone or with others. Although it is contradicted by many that it is a good idea to work with others, I incline to believe that solving these problems with others' help would give rise to much better and reliable results. I will state some strong reasons to support my claims.
In my opinion, the first and most crucial reason is that the different and complicated problems need more creative thinking and they contain different aspects of difficulty. Considering distinct kinds of difficulty to solve them make these projects to be seen from different points of views. When some different people are thinking about these projects, they are watching the problems from their own side and everybody would propose his or her suggestions about the problem. So, this brainstorming leads the group to benefits a wide range of ideas and notions which let them cope with problems. As a tangible example, I will mention an example based on my personal experience. When I was studying a master's degree at university, my supervisor suggested me to do a project with two other students. At first, I refused his idea and asked him to do the project lonely. After a while, I confronted with some problems that I had never seen. Hence, I asked two other students to help me. It surprisingly worked and we solved the problem by utilizing brainstorming.
Furthermore, another reason which has to be considered is that students cannot anticipate all the problems they will confront during doing the projects. A growing segment of students in the majority of cases will face some problems that they had not taught about them ever. When different students are working on the same problem, they might be able to predict various problems which they may confront and strive diligently to prevent confronting them. It would help them to save more time and energy during doing the projects. Consequently, the projects will be more time-effective and cost-effective. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by the University of Toronto has asserted that amounts of money and time spent on a project is negatively correlated with the numbers of experts working on it in tandem.
Drawing upon the reasons, --watching the problem from different views-- and -- -- although there are always some exceptions which are excluded from the general rule, I am to a large extent on the belief that working with others on arduous problems will cause to some innovative solutions in fewer time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 649, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...oblems with others help would give rise to much better and reliable results. I wil...
^^
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he problem from different views-- and -- -- although there are always some except...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, while, as to, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2460.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 483.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09316770186 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80356574194 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507246376812 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 749.7 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.2652327066 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.818181818 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9545454545 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.68181818182 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.85842293907 337% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136119436302 0.236089414692 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438640778357 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0289542987067 0.0737576698707 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948140327708 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0162000784445 0.0645574589148 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.