At work or school, you might encounter a problem that requires creativity -for example, you are given a task to complete that is very different from other tasks you do. In work or school situation that requires you to think creatively, would you prefer to work alone or with others? Why?
In this competitive world we are currently living, problem-solving is one of the main capabilities that anyone should possess. People whether during their formative years of education or in their job, they encounter with various problems and if they cannot find a creative way to get out of it, it would have numerous detrimental impacts on the lives. This trend prompts a controversial issue, whether people should work as a group to be innovative and propose a solution or they can work alone on it. I adamantly prefer to work alone. I subscribe to this idea because I would more productive in this way and members would interfere with my thoughts.
First and foremost, people are less efficient in the group working. When a group is formed, the responsibility of the group is on the shoulder of all members. Accordingly, they are not enough motivated to reach a proper outcome. As a result, they prefer to spend most of their time on by-products. For example, they tend to allocate their time to laughing and storytelling which are completely irrelevant to the ultimate task of the group. This issue has a considerable effect on the efficiency of the group. However, if someone works alone, he would not be faced with this problems because, in case of falling to accomplished the project on time, he would see the consequence of it personally.
More importantly, some members of the group try to play a dominant role. As a matter of fact, some of the members of the groups would have a leader characteristic meaning that they influence other members and they would attract to them easily. In this circumstance, members prefer to accept all the dominant's behaviors and solutions without thinking. This would lead the group to reach an unacceptable result. But working alone, you would work on the project and problem on your own.
Last but not least, time scheduling of the groups is an arduous task. individuals should various daily task. This burden of responsibility provokes problem of time-planning. Admittedly, in the case of fixing a specific time during the week, the possibility of being absent is a lot. On the contrary, working individually does have this drawback since you can work on the project any time you want.
In a nutshell, I prefer to work solely, because group working not only is not productive, but also the likelihood of deviating from the main goal of the group is a lot to a great extent. furthermore, since people have the various daily task, fixing a time for the meeting is quite difficult.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 570, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...works alone, he would not be faced with this problems because, in case of falling to...
^^^^
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...y a dominant role. As a matter of fact, some of the members of the groups would have a lead...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 71, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Individuals
...uling of the groups is an arduous task. individuals should various daily task. This burden ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...f the group is a lot to a great extent. furthermore, since people have the various daily ta...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, for example, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the contrary, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2099.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 431.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87006960557 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88603858728 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487238979118 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 649.8 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.0934483069 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4583333333 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9583333333 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192525776916 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058203983839 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750291301674 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117936136849 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391455130067 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.