Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People in the past were more interested in improving their neighborhood (the area where they live) than now
Environmental activists believe that if people want to tackle environmental problems such as air pollution and climate change, people need to pay attention to the region they are currently living. This trend prompts a controversial issue whether our ancestors were more interest in their area they lived or we do. I firmly believe that if our neighborhood were in a dilemma where to choose us or people lived one century ago, it would definitely choose our ancestors.
First and foremost, in these days people have burdon various responsibility on their shoulder. Since the world has become more and more competitive, people do not have enough time to devote it to development of their home. even when they reach home, they are obliged to increase their knowledge to survive in this world. Accordingly, the tendency of having a better neighborhood increases significantly.
Secondly, the industrialization of the economic play a major role in diverting the attention of people toward environmental problems. In the past, Since the most of the professions were related to agriculture, people provided their basic necessities for their family by working on the land near their home. Accordingly, by activities like lands reclamation, they tended to lift up the quality of living. With the growth of metropolitan cities, However, the economic situation has changed and people don’t need to consider their environment to increase their welfare. As a result, they have less interested in the environment they are living
Last but not least, in these days, people believe that it is government task to ameliorate their region. Due to the fact that a great part of the revenue of the government is associated with the taxes they pay to the state, they acknowledge that it does not their responsibility to concern about the place they currently live. However, the states didn’t play an important role in the past and it was habitats' task to improve their environment.
In a nutshell, I adamantly believe that previous generations had a huge vested interested in their environment. I feel this way because of changing the economic situation and also they have more free time to devote it to have a more proper neighborhood.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 224, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Even
...devote it to development of their home. even when they reach home, they are obliged ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...professions were related to agriculture, people provided their basic necessities ...
^^
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
... to agriculture, people provided their basic necessities for their family by working on the land...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 451, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tats task to improve their environment. In a nutshell, I adamantly believe that ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, i feel, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1869.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16298342541 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03859492614 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524861878453 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0503981254 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.8125 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341421720901 0.236089414692 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110098995711 0.076458572812 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595276950466 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189152454203 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406361869804 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.