It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts.
By and large, there is a controversial issue in the world that whether students should understand concepts or facts are merely enough for them. I firmly believe that students ought to study concepts at the school or university. The underlying aim of this essay is to put forward some cogent reasons to shed light on a number of issues in this framework.
Firstly, understanding concepts help in bearing fact in the students' mind. To put it in another way, when someone knows how a fact comes from or from what concepts in the science brings out this fact, they would have a deep understanding. Consequently, they will never forget it in their life. As a personal example, I am a mathematics teacher. I experimented two ways of teaching in the class. One of them was teaching merely derived formulas to students and another one was learning proofs of the formulas and encouraged them to rewrite the proof in the home. The second group of students got better scores in the final exam. Also, host of the students from the first group bemoaned about forgetting formulas during the exam.
Secondly, if the students want to continue their education through upper levels like Ph.D. therefore, facts wouldn’t assist them to get their goals. Admittedly, some of the universities in the world hold an entrance exam for applied students. In the exam, they would not ask about facts. Attendances have to have an acceptable knowledge about a field that they are going to study. As a result, teaching facts means sacrificing them to other students.
Last but not least, some people might think that studying more facts and focusing on practical parts of education will make students ready for the labor market. I think it is not necessarily a case. Although background information is beneficial for readiness in a job, these kinds of limited knowledge can learn during working. No matter how much students are taught, it is still scarce, comparing to what they are going to learn in a profession. On the other hand, because of the emergence of the technology era, most of the elite jobs in the world such as programming and marketing are based on concepts rather than facts. Nowadays, people need to upgrade themselves during working which knowing just fact would help them to progress in their career.
In a nutshell, I utterly believe people ought to study concepts. Teaching facts to them wouldn't help them to become advanced in their life
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...st them to get their goals. Admittedly, some of the universities in the world hold an entra...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 342, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...can learn during working. No matter how much students are taught, it is still scarce...
^^^^
Line 4, column 447, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hey are going to learn in a profession. On the other hand, because of the emerge...
^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... study concepts. Teaching facts to them wouldnt help them to become advanced in their l...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lp them to become advanced in their life
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, as to, i think, such as, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2026.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89371980676 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67162425118 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533816425121 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1008990625 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4166666667 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279989894015 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668743775013 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664430803417 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147362602046 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585078105612 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.