T P O 53
The reading states that there are three advantages in introducing the tax on cigarettes and unhealthy foods. However, the lecturer claims that all the reading's advantages can be challenged and oppose each of them.
First, the reading states that the taxes discourage people to reduce their unhealthy behaviors. However, the professor opposes this point by saying that by introducing taxes on cigarettes, people lead to smoke cheaper cigarettes which have lower quality because these companies prefer to use the more harmful substance in order to reduce the price of cigarettes. Accordingly, people put their body in the greater risk. this situation is similar to the unhealthy food. If governments put taxes on unhealthy foods, people tend to eat more unhealthy foods.
Second, the article claims that taxing unhealthy behaviors is fair. The professor refutes this point by stating that it is not fair to impose taxes on people since we do not take into account people's income. For example, if governments impose taxes on people with lower income and those having higher income equally, the lower income individuals shoulder the greater expenses.
Third, the reading averts that high rate taxing would increase the income of state and they would become able to invest it in different projects. The professor opposes this point and contends that reliance of governments on revenue of these taxes for completing the various project has a downside. Since they rely on the revenue of the taxes, they would not introduce policies in order to eliminate unhealthy habits. For example, they would not ban the outdoor smoking because they do not want to lose its income.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 420, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ple put their body in the greater risk. this situation is similar to the unhealthy f...
^^^^
Line 6, column 7, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...shoulder the greater expenses. Third, the reading averts that high rate taxing...
^^
Line 6, column 516, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se they do not want to lose its income.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, however, if, second, so, third, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 269.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20446096654 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5253157769 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516728624535 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8406568174 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06452816374 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.