t p o 53
The text claims that taxes on cigarette is beneficial in some ways. However the lecturer claims that requiring taxes on cigarattes is not an adequate and propriate and she believes that it is chalenging. Moreover, the speaker presents some evidence to refute them all.
First, the reading argues that taxes discourage people from buying unhealthy food or cigarattes. Therefore, the author mentiones that when the taxes on cigarattes increased the purchasing of it simultaniously decreased and it can be interfiered that it has the same result on nthe unhealthy foods. Conversely the prefessor brings up the idea that higher prises of cigarettes ont only won't be helpfull and a practical but also people will have the tendency to buy the cheaper and the lower qualiy cigarattes which is definetly harmes the salibrious states of the individuals much worse. She indicates that the the unhealthy food is no exception in this conviction and people will use the even if they are expensive.
Furthermore, the author holds the view that it is fair that the taxes just comprimise the people who sought to unhealthy behavaiours. Conversly the prefessor undelinnes the fact that fair is the matter of where you stand and if we take the view of the smokers into account we will see that they are not having pretty much the same things the goverment has in mind. IN addition she demonstrated that the taxes heavy burden is mostly influencing the people with lower incomes rather than the rich ones. Thus it is crystal clear that the consequences is not exactly what the goverment believes it is.
Finally, the text states that the taxes on cigarattes are being spent on medical issues and other schemes that benefit the whole popullation. On the other hand the selcturer dismiss this issue, pointing out that the goverment has kind of been accustomed and depended on the taxes. Hence declines to set other appropriate policies like abondening the smoking in out doors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...n cigarette is beneficial in some ways. However the lecturer claims that requiring taxe...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 298, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Conversely,
...he same result on nthe unhealthy foods. Conversely the prefessor brings up the idea that h...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 466, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people will have the tendency to buy the cheaper and the lower qualiy cigarattes ...
^^
Line 2, column 606, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ividuals much worse. She indicates that the the unhealthy food is no exception in this ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 606, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ividuals much worse. She indicates that the the unhealthy food is no exception in this ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...me things the goverment has in mind. IN addition she demonstrated that the taxes heavy b...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ower incomes rather than the rich ones. Thus it is crystal clear that the consequenc...
^^^^
Line 4, column 281, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...n accustomed and depended on the taxes. Hence declines to set other appropriate polic...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, in addition, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 327.0 270.72406181 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99388379205 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68863520586 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 145.348785872 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547400611621 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5352402004 49.2860985944 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.642857143 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 7.06452816374 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.