Some people prefer doing sports on their own, such as running, while others like to do sports in groups. Which one do you prefer?
Some people prefer to attend sport activities needed to do it as a group, others prefer to participate in sports which are done solely. There are various pros and cons in both of the decisions. However, I am fond of sports that do not depend on the group.
First and foremost, it is more convenient to do these sports. To do group activities, people need to have an accurate plan for it and if all of them were available on a particular day, they would do it. Take a football as an example, in a football, football lovers need to find twenty-two people to enable them to play with each other. Without any doubt, time scheduling of this large group is an arduous task needed allocating a lot of time and likelihood of failure and canceling the program is a lot. On the contrary, in the single member sports, all that matters is your time. If you wanna do running as an example, you need just go to a park and initiate it. It should be stressed that group sports need more facilities that not only it is not available in any place, but also sport enthusiastic individual should pay a considerable amount of money to equip themselves with it. However, doing sport individually would not cost too much and easily accessible in any place. In the previous example, all that running needs is a park and a pair of proper shoes.
More importantly, your success would not depend on talent and diligence of others. If people do group sports no matter how much hard working and gifted they are, if they do not have proper teammates, the chance of success is not a lot because a mistake by the members could have an irreversible consequence. For example in the final game of football champions league which was between Real Madrid and Liverpool, Although the most players of Liverpool did well, two severe mistakes by Liverpool goal-keeper ruined everything and they lost the game eventually. It should be stressed that in the sports like power-lifting you are on your own and in the case of being diligent and put efforts as much as possible, you will ultimately reach your goal.
In a nutshell, as a sports worm, I prefer to do sports that are considered as a solo person oriented. I feel this way because I can participate in without any hindrance and the path of being successful is more smooth that group's sports.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...them were available on a particular day, they would do it. Take a football as an ...
^^
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a football as an example, in a football, football lovers need to find twenty-two ...
^^
Line 3, column 1066, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s is a park and a pair of proper shoes. More importantly, your success would not...
^^^
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...imately reach your goal. In a nutshell, as a sports worm, I prefer to do sports...
^^
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...goal. In a nutshell, as a sports worm, I prefer to do sports that are considere...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, thus, well, for example, i feel, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1901.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59178743961 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63746106034 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7473403653 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.611111111 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61111111111 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329511776289 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110968686945 0.076458572812 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124699754686 0.0737576698707 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238224672803 0.150856017488 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105677538905 0.0645574589148 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.