tpo 18
The reading states that Torreya taxifiha which located in Florida is in danger of extinction and provides three options to protect it. However, the professor says none of the options are satisfying solutions and refutes each of them.
First, The reading states that researcher can establish Torreya in which it thrived. The professor opposes this point by saying that The original location of Torreya is affected by the climate of the larger region and it is mainly because of global warming and fewer wetland in this region. Accordingly, it is hard for Torreya to survive in this region.
Second, the article states moving Torreya to the further north of Florida is another option. However, the lecturer claims that when the scientist moved the Black tree to the further north, the increase of the population of this tree caused the death of other plants in the region. The plants which were in endanger. As a result, moving Torreya to further north could provoke unpredictable consequences.
The reading claims that last option is to preserve Torreya in the research center. The professor refutes this point by saying that preserving Torreya in the research center would decrease their capability to resist diseases. Torreya will be able to resist diseases if there will be a relatively large number of them but research centers simply have not that capacity. As a result, this option decrease their capability for surviving in the long-term
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... the professor says none of the options are satisfying solutions and refutes each of them. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, however, if, second, so, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1216.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 237.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13080168776 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53538401892 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506329113924 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 363.6 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.1818839971 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5384615385 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2307692308 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69230769231 7.06452816374 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.433205113528 0.272083759551 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168482497707 0.0996497079465 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806834379108 0.0662205650399 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25695148629 0.162205337803 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388938994415 0.0443174109184 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.