Using animals to test the safety of cosmetics or drugs used for medical reasons is never acceptable. to what extent do you agree with this statement?
No one would argue that animals are widely used for the evaluation of medicines and cosmetics effects. This trend prompts a controversial topic whether this method is against animal right and moral obligations, thus should be banned or it is vital for the human health needed to be used. I adamantly disagree with the point of view that the usage of animals for medical purposes is never acceptable. I believe this method should be moderately used but strictly monitored.
First and foremost, sustainable healthcare and cosmetics development will be achieved merely by this process. Without any doubt, drugs are indispensable for the survival of the humanity and it is an unavoidable fact that cosmetics are widely used in whole societies in today's world as well. Accordingly, since the effectiveness of the wide range of these products cannot be evaluated on humans out of the life threating risks they might have, there would be no other alternatives rather than using animals. Therefore, there is a strong correlation between using animals as test subjects and the invention of new products.
on the other hand, it is scientifically proved that anatomy of the human is far more complex than animals. Human body evolves through the time and myriads environmental factors have impacted it. therefore, the performance of some elements used in producing a specific drug can only assess in isolated species with simpler body functions.
It should be stressed that for preserving animal rights, this process should be severely monitored by the government and related organization. there should be certain regulations regarding experimenting on animals. for instance, the British government introduced a law that has allowed pharmacy researchers to utilize animals as test subjects which are already suffering from an illness.
In a nutshell, it is essential to make use of animals for creating and developing medicines and cosmetic products. Owing to the fact that some of these experiments can have human casualties. In addition, a numerous of these tests can only be conducted on animals with an uncomplex anatomy. However, in order to preserve animal rights, strict surveillance on these process should be regulated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...cts and the invention of new products. on the other hand, it is scientifically pr...
^^
Line 4, column 143, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...he government and related organization. there should be certain regulations regarding...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 215, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ons regarding experimenting on animals. for instance, the British government introd...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... on these process should be regulated.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32102272727 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94264292846 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565340909091 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7178260474 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.055555556 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268051203687 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906802441328 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696786656916 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152958513802 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714872782365 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.