tpo 9
The reading states advantages of the fuel-cell engine over the hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine and provides three reasons of supports. However, the professor claims that the reading mentioned disadvantages about internal-combustion are true but the writer was too optimistic about the fuel-cell engine.
The reading states that in comparison to the internal-combustion engine, the hydrogen used in fuel0cell engine is easily available. The professor refutes this point by saying that the hydrogen is not easily available. The factory needs to use liquid hydrogen to produce fuel for the cars and this is an artificial process. Accordingly, she says that the hydrogen is not easily accessible.
The article claims that hydrogen-based fuel can tackle the air pollution. However, the professor opposes this point by saying that Although in comparison with internal-combustion, the hydrogen-based fuel-cell engine has polluted the environment lesser, the process of purification of the hydrogen is detrimental for Earth since it uses a large amount of coal and oil to purify the hydrogen.
the reading avers that fuel-cell engine would be economically soon. The professor refutes this point by saying that manufacturing a fuel-cell engine needed a material which is scarce and expensive. The professor stressed that experimenting other material has been so far unsuccessful.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t the hydrogen is not easily available. The factory needs to use liquid hydrogen to...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...coal and oil to purify the hydrogen. the reading avers that fuel-cell engine wou...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, however, if, so, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1175.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 205.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73170731707 5.08290768461 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4451113749 2.5805825403 134% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 145.348785872 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517073170732 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 68.4759715352 49.2860985944 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.818181818 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 7.06452816374 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 53.8541721854 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.2367328918 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.