Pollution and other environmental problems are resulting from the way that many countries are developing and becoming richer. Some think this cannot be avoided.
Without any doubt, the rapid growth of environmental pollutions and their follow up problems is one of the major concerns of today’s world. It is commonly accepted among some specialists that for developing countries aiming for economic growth, there is no other option but to sacrifice the environment. However, by way of my thinking, numerous alternatives and approaches can be taken into consideration in order to cease this epidemic problem.
First and foremost, a wide range of developed countries has successfully altered their approaches for obtaining economical gains in the past decade. We have been seeing numerous examples particularly in European societies which have established sustainable environmental friendly industries without experiencing any negative economic impacts. This movement and attitude have forced other countries, which are in the turning point of becoming industrialized and developed, to lean towards environmental friendly industries in order to enable themselves to trade goods internationally. The World Trade Organization (WTO) has clarified certain regulations on this matter for its members. Accordingly, for the countries pursuing export-oriented methodology on their economics, there is simply no other option but to adopt these rules.
More importantly, recent technological advancements have paved the way to manufacturing green products. These technologies have the capacity to generate considerably fewer pollutants and detrimental emissions during their production process. Although this equipment initially cost more to purchase, they would ultimately demolish the costs the countries should pay in order to deal with the probable environmental crisis caused by manufacturing waste and pollutions. In doing so, a country enables itself to not only get richer but also preserve its ecology and environment.
Taken together, I firmly hold the idea that there are a vast variety of available choices such as grounding proper regulation and utilizing recent technologies to prevent environmental pollution simultaneously.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.97643097643 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36071129257 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656565656566 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.250096112 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.538461538 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23076923077 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241459679199 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757295991266 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394600142466 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133987083709 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643180276341 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.7 12.4159519038 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.