Pollution and other environmental problems are resulting from the way that many countries are developing and becoming richer. Some think this cannot be avoided.
The earth is faced with many problems and one of the biggest is air pollution which is happening because of the role of the human in the destruction of the environment. On the ground that environmentalist and people trying their best to protect humans' habitat from the humans' activities. Accordingly, their endeavors' outcome is introducing numerous laws to compel countries to intervene and preserve the environment. However, I adamantly hold the belief that this kinds of activities are not under the control of the people. I feel this way because of two main reasons that I will explore in the following.
First and foremost, the ultimate goal of any countries is raising GDP which is the value of all the product produced in the geographical region of a country. It would be achievable only if states encourage private sectors same as industries and companies to provide products which both have high quality and are economical. As a result, if governments interfere and inhibit the activities of a sector, it would not only increase the cost of the manufacturing but also will soar the price. Admittedly, with a higher price, government and private sectors will be defeated in the war of the competition, since other countries will not hinder the companies to have maximized profits and they can supply merchandises with a lower price.
Secondly, a group of people believes that international agencies should oblige countries to protect the environment. However, I think that it not practical. As I mentioned previously, in the way of prospering, governments cannot and should not build obstacles for private sectors. Although they may vote for environmental reforms in the international gathering in order to preserve their face in the public and between journalists, the likelihood of cheating is a lot since they can take a better position in the competitions and provide products with a lower price to the world.
in a nutshell, I believe that air pollution and environmental destruction resulting from countries' development is unavoidable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 460, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...wever, I adamantly hold the belief that this kinds of activities are not under the c...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...upply merchandises with a lower price. Secondly, a group of people believes tha...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ducts with a lower price to the world. in a nutshell, I believe that air pollutio...
^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m countries development is unavoidable.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, i feel, i think, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 332.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19277108434 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12356804178 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521084337349 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9514292962 48.9658058833 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.142857143 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229022952365 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745924601839 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633991104966 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152211772931 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0794019787583 0.0645574589148 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.