It is obvious that people confront various problems during their daily life. It is important for them to manage themselves in order to figure out these issues. In some cases, they have previous experience about problems which will help them to solve current problem, while sometimes they do not experience similar situation. In other word, they might encounter problems which will require people to utilize creativity to overcome it. Some people assert that in this situation at work or school, it is better for individuals work alone, whereas I strongly believe that it is more beneficial for them to work in a team. In the following paragraphs, I will discuss my view using some reasons and examples.
To begin with, I believe that when people face matters in their life which is different and needs creativity, it is much better for them to take advantage of solving them by working in a group. Taking part in group activities for the purpose of solving these complex problems gives people a good opportunity to share their information and knowledge with each other. In other words, members of a group have diverse skills and talents; thus, it will help them to find the best solution for the problem. When people work alone in order to complete a task, it is possible that they are not capable of carrying out it, For instance, I was forced to solve a complicated math problem when I was studying at high school. Unfortunately, I and my other classmates could not solve it. As a result, we decided to find a solution for it through working together in a group. Hence, we could solve it using each other's information and knowledge.
Moreover, I think working in a team not only helps people to resolve their problem better and faster but also give them a chance to improve social relationships. As a matter of fact, when they participate in a team to accomplish their tasks, they will able to get desirable results. Also, it will help them to save their time because working in a team enables them to achieve their objective in shorter period of time in comparison with working alone. In addition, people can develop their social relationships and skills including teamwork skills, taking responsibility, and so on, which will benefit them in different aspects of their life. For example, I often solve my work problems through working in a team. It has helped me to become friends with employees from different parts of company.
To sum up, according to the points and examples mentioned above, it is better for individuals take advantage of working in a group to complete their task instead of working alone. It will enable them to gain better results in shorter time. Furthermore, they can enhance their social relations which will have positive effects on their life. In fact, it will lead them to be more prosperous in their lives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 448, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help them find' instead.
Suggestion: help them find
...verse skills and talents; thus, it will help them to find the best solution for the problem. When...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 897, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...up. Hence, we could solve it using each others information and knowledge. Moreover, I...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 403, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...m to achieve their objective in shorter period of time in comparison with working alone. In ad...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e more prosperous in their lives.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, whereas, while, as for, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in fact, in short, as a matter of fact, as a result, in other words, in some cases, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 72.0 43.0788530466 167% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 52.1666666667 150% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2363.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 488.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84221311475 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61851491578 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473360655738 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 729.9 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 23.0 9.59856630824 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1862692946 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.739130435 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2173913043 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2608695652 5.45110844103 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158928548355 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547629684482 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537602557208 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109017806284 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034291555654 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.