Media undoubtedly is one of the most important sources that people use them to figure out news and what is happening all around the world. Besides that, some media such as internet contains various kinds of information which people can refer to them. There is a drastic contrast between different types of people on whether media including newspapers, TVs, radios and internet can be considered as reliable sources or not. While it is contradicted by many that people can trust on media, I inclined to believe that Televisions and internet are the most reliable sources which people can find anything they need there. I will state some strong reasons to support my belief.
In my opinion, the first and most important reason is that different kind of people such as students, researchers, etc. really find media specifically internet of the most important source for their researches. When students confront with an overwhelming problem or project the first thing that comes to their mind is using the internet to utilize other people's attitudes toward that special problem. In the majority of cases, other students and researchers experiences about that problem would lead them to overcome the problem. To illustrate more, when I was working on my master's thesis I could not able to deal with a special problem in developing the codes, so, I turned on my PC and started searching for that problem. In less than thirty minutes I figured out what I should do with that problem. Thus, it is important to conceive that not only does media not provide fake information, but also people can benefit media contains in practical ways.
Furthermore, another reason which has to be considered is that the amount of people who subscribe special media is utterly depended on how often media provide reliable contains. If media stop releasing news and ideas based on truth, people would not trust them anymore. Hence, the most crucial issue that helps the media to flourish and improve is providing real news. For an example, consider yellow pages. These kinds of media are not successful in selling their newspaper due to their not reliable news. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by the University of Toronto has asserted that the amount of time people spend on media and internet in positively correlated to how strongly media’s news is based on reality and truth.
Drawing upon the reasons – valuable contains for researchers- and – media’s prosperity--, although there are always some reasons which are excluded from the general rule, I am to a large extent on the belief that, media always keep trying to provide news and contents which people find them more pragmatic. It is highly recommended that researchers conduct a strong study on which factors would cause the people to find news and media more reliable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... media contains in practical ways. Furthermore, another reason which has to...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, really, so, thus, while, as to, kind of, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 25.0 11.0286738351 227% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2384.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 472.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05084745763 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62398665137 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497881355932 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 723.6 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.8598489052 48.9658058833 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.2 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27528405857 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909881238957 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481260088387 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173583005931 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465683355978 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.