The reading and the lecture are both about ecocertified american wood companies and the interest of americans to their products. The author thinks american wood compangnies will not seak for ecocertification for three reasons. However, the lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article.
First of all, the author claims that the American consumers don’t trust in advertsement and are not intrestes to the ecocertified values of american wood. This point is challenged by the lecturer who says that studies show that american customers are pay really attention to the ecocertified products. They are confident toward independant ecologically friendly agencies.
Second, the author states that American consumers are likely motivated by price. He argues that they are more intrested in the cheap uncertified wood than in expensive certified wood. The lecturer rebuts this argument. She suggests that although american are attracted by cheaper products, they really pay attetion to the certified wood because there is not a big price difference. The certified wood s only 5% more costly than the uncertified product. She elaborates that in this case, american would choose the certified agencies.
Finally, the author mentions that pursuing ecocertification is advantageous to american wood companies only in the international market. The lecturer on the other hand, states that since American consumers are really attracted by ecological product, the domestic wood compagnies should adopt ecologically practices. She puts forth the idea that if they don’t so, the american consumer interest will be captured by foreign competitors
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s will not seak for ecocertification for three reasons. However, the lecturer cas...
^^
Line 7, column 439, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will be captured by foreign competitors
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, really, second, so, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 249.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66265060241 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98148888635 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522088353414 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8533420366 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0969168474153 0.272083759551 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.037717846971 0.0996497079465 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440253753531 0.0662205650399 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.069571023806 0.162205337803 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040366311266 0.0443174109184 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 53.8541721854 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.25 12.2367328918 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.