Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Alantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews of frog croaks, so they called t

The text and the lecture talk about the source of a underwater sound detected by the Russian submarines. The author mention that there is 3 possible theories that can explains where the sound came from. The lecturer casts doubt on all the reading argument.

First of all, the author claims that orca whales live in the area and researches proved that this big creature make sound to attract a mate, which explain the strange noise detected by the submarines. The lecturer refutes this point. She claims that the orca whales live near the surface however the sailors patrolling deep in the water, which enable them to detect the sound.

Second, the author suggests that a Giant squid who is classified as a intelligent animal can provide sound without detecting their movement because they have soft bodies with no skeleton. The professor oppose this idea. She explains that the sound was between 1960 and 1980, if the Giant squid ever existed we can hear the sound until today.

Finally, the text states that another country submarines that have emitted this strange sound and they were not detectable thanks to technology they were using at that time. However the lecturer opposes this argument. She put on forth the idea that at that time it is impossible to build a technology that able the submarine to move fast without the engine can make a noise and be undetectable while communicating with each other and discovering the area .

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...nd the lecture talk about the source of a underwater sound detected by the Russia...
^
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...can explains where the sound came from. The lecturer casts doubt on all the reading...
^^^
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...that a Giant squid who is classified as a intelligent animal can provide sound wi...
^
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'opposes'.
Suggestion: opposes
... bodies with no skeleton. The professor oppose this idea. She explains that the sound ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n 1960 and 1980, if the Giant squid ever existed we can hear the sound until toda...
^^^
Line 7, column 175, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...echnology they were using at that time. However the lecturer opposes this argument. She...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 455, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...with each other and discovering the area .
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, so, while, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1202.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9262295082 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38653727883 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577868852459 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.6750302713 49.2860985944 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.166666667 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06452816374 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0926955879607 0.272083759551 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0305975311677 0.0996497079465 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0315850021956 0.0662205650399 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0547813106261 0.162205337803 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255469652583 0.0443174109184 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.