the reading and the lecture are both about the possobility of sending humand in a trip to Mars, which is a challenging mission. The author of the reading believes that this project is almost impossible to realise because the trip to Mars requires solving many problems. The lecture casts doubt on the claims made in the article. She thinks that even if scientifics found solutions to these problems stated by the writer.
First of all, the author claims that the trip to Mars will take at least two years time which is a long period comparing to the trip to the Moon. Astronautes will need big amounts of food, oxygen and water that can not be provided for such a period of time. The author believes that the ship's capacity is too limited to put on a big quatities of supplies. This point is challenged by the lecturer who says that astronauts can you a new technic callet Hydrauponic which consists on growin plants and crops with their roots in water instead of the soil. This Technic doesn't require a large place. Furthermore, she points out that using the hydropanic provides a recycling system of used water into drinking water. Also, the plants absorbing the CO2 gives fresh air to breath in return.
Secondly, the author states that during this trip, the austronauts will be in the zero gravity environment which causes a severe health problems after spending a long time in space. He provides the exemples of the decrease of muscle mass and bone density. The lecturer rebuts this argument. She thinks that after the trip to the Moon, a lot other trips were be made for several months around the Earth. This helped the astronauts to develop several technics to safely manage the effects of the zero-gravity environment such as the regular excercice to increase the muscle mass, and the use of vitamis and minerals like calcium to provide to decrease of bone density.
Third, the author mentions that a ship travelling in interplanetary space will be exposed to an important danger due to the space radiation coming from the Sun. The lecturer, on the other hand, states that the levels of space radiation is not dangerous all the time. An important dangerous levels occurs occasionally. She puts forth the idea that the austronauts can have special instruments that detects the important radiations. In this case, astronauts can hide in small shielded areas until the danger has passed, and then continue their mission in unshielded areas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the reading and the lecture are both about ...
^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ter that can not be provided for such a period of time. The author believes that the ships cap...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'ships'' or 'ship's'?
Suggestion: ships'; ship's
...d of time. The author believes that the ships capacity is too limited to put on a big...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...water instead of the soil. This Technic doesnt require a large place. Furthermore, she...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...rip to the Moon, a lot other trips were be made for several months around the Eart...
^^
Line 7, column 291, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'level'?
Suggestion: level
...us all the time. An important dangerous levels occurs occasionally. She puts forth the...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, at least, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 30.3222958057 195% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2037.0 1373.03311258 148% => OK
No of words: 418.0 270.72406181 154% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87320574163 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.04702891845 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5353445754 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 145.348785872 153% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533492822967 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 419.366225166 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9332332685 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9047619048 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0766855480751 0.272083759551 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0207045513953 0.0996497079465 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281336218809 0.0662205650399 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0460191925444 0.162205337803 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00710969487498 0.0443174109184 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 63.6247240618 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.