electronic medical information, electronic databases, paper form, reducing costs, preventing errors, aiding research, patients' paper records
In this set of material, both the author and the lecturer are discussing about databases and records for medical information, and which of the electronic databases or paper form are better. While the author declares that the electronic medical information has several advantages, the professor explains that these advantages are very uncertain. There is no preference using electronic databases at the compare of paper forms. In what follows, reasons of the both the author and the lecturer will be substantiated.
Firstly, both the author and the professor have a debate on costs. According to the reading passage, it is said that electronic medical information leads to low costs. On the other hand, the professor believes they need emergency backup. So, it has not little costs. For example, doctors should put signature on the paper, and it's easy for them instead of electronic one.
Secondly, the reading and talk give their viewpoint about errors in the forms. The author asserts that electronic information tends to be without error, and their errors are at the low level. In contrast, the lecturer proclaims that the electronic type of forms cannot eliminate errors. Because staffs should type the forms on the automation system, the hand-writing error may be transferred to the computers, and the staffs need to adapt to system.
Finally, the author declaims that the electronic forms have aiding research. However, the professor does not agree with the passage. Because there is a need to a permission to access some information from security center of laboratories, hospitals, and so forth, therefore it cannot be easy to access the databases. Moreover, someone can block information.
In conclusion, the advantages of the electronic information are uncertain.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 281.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32740213523 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86969140056 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505338078292 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 466.2 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.1498191894 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1666666667 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6111111111 21.698381199 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300153682555 0.272083759551 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896039449711 0.0996497079465 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080098405851 0.0662205650399 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155111602887 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514496118137 0.0443174109184 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.