Elephants
The reading passage states that humans have several beliefs about elephants that come from their interests to the elephants. The writer of the passage provides some arguments to support this point of view. however, the lecturer finds all the ideas discussed by the reading passage dubious and suggests some evidence to refute them all.
First, the writer claims that elephants become aware when they are going to die. So, they leave their herds and go to the places near the water to die alone. On the contrary, the professor dismisses this idea due to the fact that when elephants become old they can not eat all the vegetations. Therefore, they left their herd and go to find soft vegetations. These vegetations are abundant in places near the water.
Furthermore, the author asserts that elephants can create art such as painting flowers or other elephants by using brushes. Conversely, the speaker underlines the fact that elephants' ears are very sensitive. Humans touch their ears to tell them how to move their trunks. Therefore, they do not create art only by their abilities.
Finally, the passage believes that elephants have fear of mice because when they confront mice they try to go away. The lecturer, on the other hand, makes the argument that elephants react to the mice in that way because these mammals are not familiar to them. However, elephants that live in the zoo do not react to mice like other elephants because they saw mice before.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...rguments to support this point of view. however, the lecturer finds all the ideas discu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, so, therefore, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1214.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 247.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91497975709 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38589697695 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522267206478 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7970915807 49.2860985944 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.9333333333 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4666666667 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344071494825 0.272083759551 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1296210465 0.0996497079465 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133057078211 0.0662205650399 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213245743178 0.162205337803 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0888674907104 0.0443174109184 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.