Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should assign homework for students every day.
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the effect of teachers' teaching approaches on the students' success. In this regard one controversial question is whether it is better that teachers give assignments to the students or not. Despite the arguments asserting that teachers should not give students assignments, I believe otherwise, maintaining that assignments have beneficial effects on the students. To support this, there are myriads of reasons, two of which are going to be aptly elucidated through the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, the most prominent reason that comes to my mind is that dealing with assignments provides an opportunity for students to find out lessons in which they have problems. Therefore, they can review classes' lessons or ask their questions from teachers in the next class. For instance, when I was a high school student, my chemic teacher gave us an assignment each week. When I were accomplishing one of the assigments, I found out that I had understood class's lessons wrongly. So, in the next class I asked my teacher to explain briefly what he explained in the previous class. Had not my teacher given the assignments, I would not have corrected my wrong understinding.
Furthermore, another noteworthy reason that should be taken into account is that when students accomplish assignments, they could remember easily what they have learned. So, this leads to enhancement in their studing performance and consequently in their exams' grades. Recently, a study has been carried out at the University of Tehran about the effect of giving assignments to the students on their exams' grades. Scientists evaluated two group of students. The first group's teacher gave assignments to the students but the second group did not do any assignments. According to the results have been obtained, students who accomplished the assignments got twenty percent more in their final exams compared to the students who did not do assignments.
To sum up, taking all the aforementioned reasons to account, one can conclude that giving assignments to the students no only does help them to find out their misunderstinding but also helps them to remember what they learned in the long-term.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... of teachers teaching approaches on the students success. In this regard one controversi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
...luated two group of students. The first groups teacher gave assignments to the student...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 132, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help them find' instead.
Suggestion: help them find
...ssignments to the students no only does help them to find out their misunderstinding but also hel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, consequently, first, furthermore, second, so, therefore, for instance, in brief, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1858.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 358.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18994413408 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99997399154 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530726256983 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8927215636 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.294117647 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0588235294 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213871153218 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720029278592 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539087079309 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125303423261 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490885766261 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.