Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the effect of workers working conditions on their feelings. In this regard, one controversial question is whether it is better for workers to deal with different tasks in a workday or do a single task. Despite the arguments asserting that it is beneficial for workers to do a single task, I believe otherwise, maintaining that workers should do divers type of works in a workday. To support this there are myriads of reasons, two of which are going to be aptly elucidated through the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, the most prominent reason that comes to my mind is that doing different types of tasks in a workday could lead to diversity. however, when workers do the same task for a whole day, working become monotonous and they feel tired. Therefore, workers lose their motivation to work, and consequently, their efficiency will decline drastically. For instance, after graduation from university, I started working in a company as an internship. Because I had not many skills, I should do a specific task whole a day. After two months I became depressed due to my work circumstances. Finally, I decided to change my work. After searching a lot for a new position, I found a new job in which I deal with different tasks. Now I am so happy about the decision that I made. Had not I changed the company that I worked, I would not have a job with diverse tasks.
Furthermore, another noteworthy reason that should be taken into account is that accomplishing different tasks in a day provides an opportunity for workers to use their brains more. So, it has a beneficial effect on the workers' health in the long-term. Recently, a study has been carried out at the University of Tehran about the effect of workers working conditions on their health level. One of the work conditions that has been evaluated is the number of tasks that workers do in a single day. According to the results have been obtained, workers who deal with more tasks have a better health level compared to the workers who do one or a little number of tasks.
To sum up, taking all the aforementioned reasons to account, one can conclude that it is better for workers to do different tasks in the workday because in this condition not only do workers' performance rise but also in the long-term they will have a better health level.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 145, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...s in a workday could lead to diversity. however, when workers do the same task for a wh...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 528, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... should do a specific task whole a day. After two months I became depressed due to my...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
.... So, it has a beneficial effect on the workers health in the long-term. Recently, a st...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1941.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6884057971 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78669122314 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473429951691 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 605.7 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0881107217 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.05 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372860578708 0.236089414692 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111460351702 0.076458572812 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109411700457 0.0737576698707 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248085987231 0.150856017488 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240006810493 0.0645574589148 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.