Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the effect of governments' money spending approaches on the development of society. in this regard, one controversial question is whether it is better that governments spend money on improving internet access or improving public transportation. Despite arguments asserting that governments should spend more money on public transportation, I believe otherwise, maintaining that spending money on the internet has more benefits for people.
First and foremost, the most prominent reason that comes to my mind is that thanks to the advent of computers, people can accomplish their works from long distance. If all people have access to the internet, they would not need to go to different places in the city and consequently, they will use public transportation less. Therefore, by doing so need for spending more money on public transportation will eliminate. For instance, many people should use public transportation to do their banking activities. However, nowadays, there are different options such as cell phone applications or web sites that provide a great possibility to do banking from home.
Furthermore, another noteworthy reason that should be taken into account is that nowadays communication with the whole word is more important than easy access to different places in a city. By using the internet, companies can extend their activities beyond a city and it brings them more success. for instance, my brother has established a new company that provides some services for people who need advice about the computers. This company has not a specific place for its employees and they work from their homes. All the services they provide need the internet. After a year they have many customers from different places in the country. Had not people had access to the internet, my brother would not have become successful.
To sum up, taking all the aforementioned reasons into account, one can conclude that it is far better that governments spend money on the internet because not only will people have less need for public transportation but also, they can extend their jobs by using the internet.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...proaches on the development of society. in this regard, one controversial question...
^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...a city and it brings them more success. for instance, my brother has established a ...
^^^
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: GIVE_ADVISE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'advise' (a verb)?
Suggestion: advise
...vides some services for people who need advice about the computers. This company has n...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 567, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ervices they provide need the internet. After a year they have many customers from di...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 651, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'peopled'.
Suggestion: peopled
...ifferent places in the country. Had not people had access to the internet, my brother ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1802.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 346.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20809248555 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94330356088 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50289017341 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3916453538 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.625 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5625 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332069277783 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113693932138 0.076458572812 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100729649981 0.0737576698707 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213326957825 0.150856017488 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0922764381239 0.0645574589148 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.