Sending humans to Mars
Te reading passage explains three problems that the astronauts confront when they want to go to Mars. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas discussed by the reading passage dubious and suggests some solutions to refute them all.
First, the reading passage claims that bringing enough food, water, and oxygen which are important for the crew creates problems because of restriction in the space of the vehicles. Conversely, the speaker underlines the fact that the crew can use hydroponic to cultivate their food in the space. In addition, they can use this system to recycle water. Also, the space vehicle has a technology to absorb carbon dioxide and produce oxygen from it. Therefore, the crew will not have problems related to the resources that they need.
Furthermore, the author asserts that zero-gravity causes problems to the human body in that long period. On the contrary, the professor dismisses this idea due to the fact that humans have experiences in living many months in the space stations. They do regular exercises to protect their body from the negative effect of zero-gravity.
Finally, the reading passage believes that the astronauts might expose to the space radiation released by the sun. The lecturer, on the other hand, makes the argument that the sun releases harmful radiation only in short periods. So, they can build a small shield that does not add considerable weight to the ship. In normal times, the crews do not need to protect themselves. However, by using equipment that allows them to predict the sun's activity level, in the periods that the sun releases harmful radiation they can protect themselves by using this small shield.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 437, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'suns'' or 'sun's'?
Suggestion: suns'; sun's
...uipment that allows them to predict the suns activity level, in the periods that the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, so, therefore, in addition, in short, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 10.4613686534 10% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09090909091 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5223994873 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0827303322 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3333333333 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53333333333 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0325514608885 0.272083759551 12% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0121743920734 0.0996497079465 12% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311544934779 0.0662205650399 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0246640537798 0.162205337803 15% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427193942672 0.0443174109184 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.