The text and the lecture provide opposite viewpoints regarding the works of Emperor Claudius of Rome. On the one hand, the text states that he was innovative, fair, wise and has a lot of wisdom, but on the other hand, the professor states that he was a bad judge and has done many notorious acts. The lecture also denies the notion that Claudius must be praised for his works.
To begin with, although the text states that Claudius was wise, innovative and has built the Roman harbor, the professor states that all this has happened after the assassination of the previous ruler. Moreover, his works lead to the outburst of the Civil war in Rome. So, the belief that Claudius was a good person, as per the text, is refuted by the professor.
Moreover, Claudius was considered as a bad judge according to the lecture. He doesn't listen to both the sides of the argument most of the times. What's more, he often encouraged the execution of people just for amusement. These points overshadow the claims made in the reading - he was a gifted with strong judgment. Thus, the text and the recording offer two contrasting views about the judgmental abilities of Claudius.
Finally, the professor also denies the reading that Claudius has a lot of wisdom. While the text states that he offered slaves many opportunities in politics to grow, the professor refutes this statement and claims that these slaves are mostly corrupt as they accepted bribes. The professor also states that Claudius's last wife has killed him by using poison in the mushroom. Furthermore, his son was a terrible ruler, the worst leader and must not be considered to be made as an heir according to the lecture. These statements contradict the ideas made in the reading that Claudius should be praised as he encouraged women and slaves.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... bad judge according to the lecture. He doesnt listen to both the sides of the argumen...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 146, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...ides of the argument most of the times. Whats more, he often encouraged the execution...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 310.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83225806452 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53445156858 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503225806452 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 455.4 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6398347191 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.625 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165257229718 0.272083759551 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565717707536 0.0996497079465 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390784897463 0.0662205650399 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113307729363 0.162205337803 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429050373189 0.0443174109184 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.