At the end of the Triassic period 200 million years ago, there was a mass-extinction event that caused the extinction of more than half of all living species. It was this extinction event that allowed dinosaurs to become the dominant species for the next

The lecturer disputes the author's suggested explanations of the causes of the massive extinction at the end of the Triassic period. She provides three concrete reasons to cast doubt the author's claims.

First, according to the text the reason for the massive extinction is the decline in sea water level. However, the lecturer find this idea debatable. She asserts that indeed, this decline in water level does not cause such a massive extinction because animals living in shallow water are able to adapt to this change over time.

Second, the lecturer contradicts the fallacy of the passage that the release of sulfur dioxide into the air causes a significant decline in air temperature. She contends that theoretically speaking this may happen if the decline took place for an extended period of time. However, during the Triassic period, the rain washed away all the sulfuric oxide, thus, all the chemicals were cleared out.

Finally, the author argues that an asteroid which struck the earth may have cause this problem. Again, the lecturer disputes this points. He contends that the only crater found on the surface of the earth is dated 12 millions years before the Triassic period, which make this explanation as an invalid one

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... the decline took place for an extended period of time. However, during the Triassic period, t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 306, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... make this explanation as an invalid one
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, thus

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 7.30242825607 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1040.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 204.0 270.72406181 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09803921569 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44717351415 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.886216515 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5454545455 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5454545455 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 7.06452816374 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206315541174 0.272083759551 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764779046294 0.0996497079465 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608488661433 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122444964304 0.162205337803 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270113984219 0.0443174109184 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.