Essay topics: TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task
In this set materials, the reading passage state that humans prefer to use glass for designing a building, but birds cannot recognize the glass and collapse with it; therefore, the reading provides tree solutions for this problem. On the other hand, the listening section brings into question the reading points by providing different reasons (and examples).
First of all, the reading passage indicates that people can use one-way glasses. The people who live in the building can see out but the birds cannot see indoor. In contrast, the lecturer opposes this view by mentioning that one-way glasses work as the same as a mirror. If this glass reflects the sky or trees, the birds do not recognise and distinguish this image. Therefore, they crash with the glass and become injured.
Second, the reading argues that individuals use some colourful lines on the glasses, for the birds can distinguish the glass; conversely, what the speaker believes is different. He points that the birds think that this line is open holes ; thus, they try to fly to them. He also adds that if the designer makes the opening areas very small that bird could not fly through them, the light cannot get in from windows, so the rooms become dark.
Finally, according to the reading, a magnetic field is created around the building, and it helps to birds for finding direction. However, the professor claims that birds only use a magnetic field for finding ways when they want to travel long distance. For example, they use a magnetic field when they want to migrate from a cold place to a warmer place. But, for short distance such as travelling across the city, they do not use a magnetic field for finding their ways. In this situation, they use the sun or their eye's sight for finding their path.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 101, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'bird'.
Suggestion: bird
...ed around the building, and it helps to birds for finding direction. However, the pro...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, in contrast, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 306.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86274509804 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34789936619 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 145.348785872 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545751633987 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7777213762 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.444690198881 0.272083759551 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147311026638 0.0996497079465 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621574550837 0.0662205650399 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258356094314 0.162205337803 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560650618848 0.0443174109184 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.