TPO 18
The lecturer and the reading passage discuss Torreya taxifoha trees that become died in Florida. Although the reading passage claims that some possible ways for preventing extension of this tree, the speaker refutes this idea through several reasons which I will describe in this reporter.
First and foremost, the reading points out that reestablish Torreya in the same place as they live would prevent died these trees. The lecturer, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that reestablish Torreya in the same place unlikely successful. A coolest and dampest era is changing. Because climate change effects on them, and they become warmer and dry places. Therefore, it is hard to find a proper location that not change with global effect.
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states that Torreya can cultivate and grow in a different location for preventing died them, the professor argues that this solution is not practical. Consider black local trees that change their location for instance. This tree spread so quickly in the place and started to kill local plants and trees. The black trees cause extend many other types of trees and plants. So it is not a suitable solution.
Finally, although the reading passage says that protecting Torreya in research centers, and these notions help to easily conduct the study and close monitoring of plants. The speaker disagrees by mentioning that the population of Torreya that live in this place are not big. And, they do not resist the disease. Therefore, they need a large place for growing a lot of this tree. Until they can preserve from the disease. So, it is not a proper solution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 21, column 380, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Until” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e place for growing a lot of this tree. Until they can preserve from the disease. So,...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, for instance, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15867158672 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42954674854 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531365313653 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.2116508048 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.6666666667 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0555555556 21.698381199 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05555555556 7.06452816374 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241865397326 0.272083759551 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730545388244 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623701319417 0.0662205650399 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154929362053 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129776477946 0.0443174109184 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.