First, as human populations and settlements continue to expand, birds' natural habitats will continue to disappear. Forests, wetlands, and grasslands will give way to ever more homes, malls, and offices. As the traditional areas suitable for birds keep decreasing, so will the size of the bird populations that depend on those vanishing habitats.
Second, agricultural activities must increase to keep pace with the growing human population. The growth of agriculture will also result in the further destruction of bird habitats as more and more wilderness areas are converted to agricultural use. As a result, bird populations in rural areas will continue to decline.
Third, as human settlements expand and agriculture increases, the use of chemical pesticides will also increase. Pesticides are poisons designed to kill agricultural and home garden pests, such as insects, but inevitably, pesticides get into the water and into the food chain for birds where they can harm birds. Birds that eat the poisoned insects or drink contaminated water can die as a result, and even if pesticides do not kill birds outright, they can prevent them from reproducing successfully. So pesticides have significantly contributed to declines in bird population, and because there will continue to be a need to control agricultural pests in the future, this decline will continue.
Recently, there has been a controversy on the decrease of the bird population in the United States. More specifically, in regard to the passage, the writer put forth three possible reasons for the sudden extinction. The lecturer is quick to point out that there are some serious flaws in the writer's claim.In fact, he addresses in detail the solution to each claim made in the reading text.
First and foremost, the author states that as the human population increases the dwelling place of birds continues to disappear.The lecturer, however, stands in firm opposition to this claim. He states that suburban occupant shows pieces of evidence about the rapid increase in the cities.e.g falcon, pigeons e.t.c
Secondly, the writer feels that an increase in farm produces leads to further destruction which eventually results in the low level of birds in the countryside.Again, the speaker addresses the point when he states that less land area is used for farming activities in the United States. Besides, more agriculture activities will come from a variety of crops that produce food per unit on land.
Finally, the author brings his argument to a close by suggesting that the use of chemicals will prevent birds from multiplying. Not surprisingly, the professor rebutted this claim by positing that less harmful pesticides will be developed and also more pesticides resistant crops won’t be attracting crops. Therefore the birds wont be harmed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 307, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...some serious flaws in the writers claim.In fact, he addresses in detail the soluti...
^^
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...g place of birds continues to disappear.The lecturer, however, stands in firm oppos...
^^^
Line 3, column 315, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in the cities.e.g falcon, pigeons e.t.c Secondly, the writer feels that an incre...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Again
...e low level of birds in the countryside.Again, the speaker addresses the point when h...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 308, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...istant crops won’t be attracting crops. Therefore the birds wont be harmed.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in fact, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1228.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27038626609 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82957959032 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622317596567 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 100.521971064 49.2860985944 204% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 136.444444444 110.228320801 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8888888889 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1111111111 7.06452816374 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189888506501 0.272083759551 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802265836089 0.0996497079465 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501039232652 0.0662205650399 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103315067068 0.162205337803 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191149568953 0.0443174109184 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.3589403974 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.