The reading and lecture are the both discussed about a working plan which present five days a week for eight hours each day. The reading says that workers are willing to work earn and less money and provides several reasons. However, the professor opposes it and refutes each author’s reasons.
First of all, the first argument used by author is that these plan will increase companies’ profit since the rested worker will make fewer errors in their work. Moreover, thanks to 4 days plan, companies can recruit more staff without paying much more money. However, the professor refutes it by saying that this plan will force to spend much more money and there will be extra cost such as providing training, new office space and they will be cut of profits.
Secondly, reading claims that one of main advantage of these plan is that reducing unemployment rate. If all workers prefer to work 4 days, It will create new available jobs. But, the speaker claims that not all workers will choose it. The plan may raise expectation of employers such as working extra, adding new workload.
Lastly, the reading posits that It has benefit for lives of employees such as pursuit private interest enjoyable activities, extra times for families. With this plan workers might have more free time in their private life. The speaker refutes it and says they might harm their carrier and lose their job at crises times. What is more, Companies might choose five days worker at management point.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spending'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: spending
... it by saying that this plan will force to spend much more money and there will be extra...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, such as, first of all, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1247.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94841269841 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29916059808 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59126984127 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.606031802 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0714285714 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125631424997 0.272083759551 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484840417415 0.0996497079465 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920982572679 0.0662205650399 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.084904557189 0.162205337803 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686874606616 0.0443174109184 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.