Four day work
The topic of the reading passage is on four-day week work policy. The author supports the four-day work giving three supporting factors. But in the lecture, professor speaks against it and provide reasons for his opinion by refuting the points provided in the passage.
First of all passage states that four-day work policy may increase the profits, because it will reduce work load on employees and they feel more rest which results in reduce stress and work efficiency. Another is companies only need to pay 80% of the wage. But professor argues against this and state that it will increase the cost. This policy demands more workers, which require more office space and computers. And the training programs and health insurances for new employees will cut the profit.
Secondly passage states that the unemployment will reduce under the four-day work. Because employers need to hire more workers to cover the reduce work per week. But in the lecture, it is pointed out that this is not true and this depends on employers expectations. After the policy companies may expect workers to work overtime to cover their work. Therefore, there will be no new hires.
Last point is about the free time employees get. Reading states that they will get a free time and they can use them to spend time with families and be in leisurely. But professor sees this free time can harm the employee’s career. Companies may give priority for five day workers over four day workers when getting promotions, assigning management responsibilities. Because of this, it can reduce the quality of the life of four day workers.
As the conclusions, it is clear that reading passage supports the four-day work week policy under three facts. In the lecture professor points out weaknesses in those and suggest four day work policy might not give the expected advantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nt will reduce under the four-day work. Because employers need to hire more workers to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...yers need to hire more workers to cover the reduce work per week. But in the lecture, it i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...this depends on employers expectations. After the policy companies may expect workers...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 5.04856512141 297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 309.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0355987055 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.528057074 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491909385113 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 460.8 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4709130678 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.8 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.45 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 7.06452816374 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.456929168021 0.272083759551 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158300674362 0.0996497079465 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.176859530357 0.0662205650399 267% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.315869286954 0.162205337803 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107671455246 0.0443174109184 243% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.