Fuel-cell engine over internal-combation engin
The lecture and the reading both discuss whether or not Fuel-cell engines effective in automobiles. While the reading states that hydrogen-based engine works better than fuel engine, the professor refutes this, saying that although fuel-cell engines work better, this is not the solution.
First of all, the reading claims that fuel-cell machine work with hydrogen and it is plentiful in nature. The professor argues that it is not easily available. Furthermore, the lecture states that it requires pure liquid hydrogen and it is difficult to obtain. it must require the laboratory prepare and store because it should preserve extreme cold temperature.
In addition, the reading makes the argument that Hydrogen machine less hazardous to the environment it releases fewer pollutants. The lecture counters this point by stating it is not a solution for environmental pollution. According to the professor, pure hydrogen getting from water requires a lot of chemical procedures; which release a lot of pollution through the industry.
Lastly, the reading passage posits that fuel-cell engine economically benefits over fuel engine. The lecture refutes this claim by pointing out that hydrogen engine is expensive it costs more money to design because it is necessary to made with platinum components. Platinum significantly reacts with hydrogen to release energy for the engine to work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...he lecture and the reading both discuss whether or not Fuel-cell engines effective in automobi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 261, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...hydrogen and it is difficult to obtain. it must require the laboratory prepare and...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, lastly, so, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1175.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 213.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51643192488 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8194667505 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558685446009 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8076833766 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9166666667 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273868212236 0.272083759551 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105835527061 0.0996497079465 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132555145271 0.0662205650399 200% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177515401682 0.162205337803 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150613120006 0.0443174109184 340% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.