The given material presents the pros and cons for a professor to be a part of a televison program and the mere consequences that it has, directly or indirectly, on the reputation of a professor.
To begin with, as per the author he believes that it is good for the professors to be a part of the T.V. program as it gives a insight of the expert opinion to the general public regarding the topic and increase the reputaion of the professor. However, the speaker believes that such activities would rather harm the image of the professor as many scholars may think that he is not serious in his work and focuses on the entertainment world rather than his field of expertise. In fact, the speaker argues that such activities would hamper him regarding various opportunities like international conferences and seminars.
Furthermore, the author believes that such activities will improve the reputation of the university and also support in the overall increament of the donation that a professor gets for his research. On the otherhand, the speaker claims that it would rather waste the time of the professor as he is focused more on the travelling and rehersal for talk shows rather than his field of expertise.
Finally, the author claims that such activities will give the expert knowledge to the lay man and they can be well known about the various facts. They can also have a detailed knowledge about the topic. But, the speaker denies the claim of the author stating that T.V. shows prefer only intellectual topic rather than a intellectual shows and they actually don't give as information as it is believed. Rather it just focuses on the general background on the topic which can be easily carried out by the reporters also.
To sum up, the speaker strongly disagrees with the claim made by the author and believes that such activities do harm to a career of a intellectual professional, like a lecturer or a professor; thus, it is wise to avoid such programs.
The given material presents the pros and cons for a professor to be a part of a televison program and the mere consequences that it has, directly or indirectly, on the reputation of a professor.
To begin with, as per the author he believes that it is good for the professors to be a part of the T.V. program as it gives a insight of the expert opinion to the general public regarding the topic and increase the reputaion of the professor. However, the speaker believes that such activities would rather harm the image of the professor as many scholars may think that he is not serious in his work and focuses on the entertainment world rather than his field of expertise. In fact, the speaker argues that such activities would hamper him regarding various opportunities like international conferences and seminars.
Furthermore, the author believes that such activities will improve the reputation of the university and also support in the overall increament of the donation that a professor gets for his research. On the otherhand, the speaker claims that it would rather waste the time of the professor as he is focused more on the travelling and rehersal for talk shows rather than his field of expertise.
Finally, the author claims that such activities will give the expert knowledge to the lay man and they can be well known about the various facts. They can also have a detailed knowledge about the topic. But, the speaker denies the claim of the author stating that T.V. shows prefer only intellectual topic rather than a intellectual shows and they actually don't give as information as it is believed. Rather it just focuses on the general background on the topic which can be easily carried out by the reporters also.
To sum up, the speaker strongly disagrees with the claim made by the author and believes that such activities do harm to a career of a intellectual professional, like a lecturer or a professor; thus, it is wise to avoid such programs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... a part of the T.V. program as it gives a insight of the expert opinion to the ge...
^
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... a insight of the expert opinion to the general public regarding the topic and increase the re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... harm the image of the professor as many scholars may think that he is not seriou...
^^
Line 13, column 319, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...fer only intellectual topic rather than a intellectual shows and they actually do...
^
Line 13, column 358, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... a intellectual shows and they actually dont give as information as it is believed. ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 402, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
... give as information as it is believed. Rather it just focuses on the general backgrou...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 513, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... be easily carried out by the reporters also. To sum up, the speaker strongly d...
^^^^
Line 17, column 134, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... such activities do harm to a career of a intellectual professional, like a lectu...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, furthermore, however, may, regarding, so, thus, well, in fact, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 339.0 270.72406181 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85545722714 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7976392471 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445427728614 0.540411800872 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 505.8 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.5531812709 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.636363636 110.228320801 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8181818182 21.698381199 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6363636364 7.06452816374 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357411150743 0.272083759551 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150500176898 0.0996497079465 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.217168707729 0.0662205650399 328% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258916411208 0.162205337803 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.253404918147 0.0443174109184 572% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.3589403974 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 53.8541721854 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.7273730684 172% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.