Both reading and listening discuss a problem which birds face. The reading states that people can protect the birds from injuries which stem from glasses and provide several solutions. However, the listening says that these theories won’t work and refutes each author’s reasons.
The first solution which used by article is one way mirror glasses which transparent only one side. If the birds cannot see inside of buildings, they will not try to fly inside of them. Hence, they will not injury. On the contrary, the speaker claim that one way glasses won’t stop bird to injury. They are bad as normal glasses. Birds will try to fly through one side glasses since they reflect other side such tree or another.
Secondly, the reading says that the glasses which has colorful design might solve the problem. If people paint regular glasses, it may prevent the birds to fly in it. Conversely, the lecturer say that colorful glasses has also some negative outcome. The birds will see these glasses as open hole and will fly inside of it. Furthermore, these glasses also is not okay for people since they make inside darkness.
Finally, the article posit that people keep the birds away from buildings by using magnetic field. They can use powerful electromagnets which product signals to prevent the birds. In contrast, the professor posit that the idea of magnetic field will not figure out problems. The birds use it when the migrate long distances but in short trip they use their eyes and reflect of shine.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lasses which transparent only one side. If the birds cannot see inside of building...
^^
Line 7, column 298, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ure out problems. The birds use it when the migrate long distances but in short trip they u...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, in contrast, in short, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1275.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 256.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98046875 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29434583861 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54296875 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.4445102685 49.2860985944 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.8333333333 110.228320801 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2222222222 21.698381199 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61111111111 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270081627415 0.272083759551 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894147413265 0.0996497079465 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058741150399 0.0662205650399 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155314746352 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081514579212 0.0443174109184 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.3589403974 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.01 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.